Much of the debate surrounding bitcoin's scaling problem seems to stem from two different visions of what bitcoin should be right now: a store of value or a peer-to-peer digital cash system. Both sides agree that in the long run both of these properties should be met, but the question is: Will bitcoin hold value even if TX throughput does not scale soon or do we risk losing our first mover advantage if bitcoin is not able to fulfil its promises as a peer-to-peer cash system soon.
I would love to hear some arguments from both sides of this debate
There's head and tails, positive and negative people. Similarly there will be holders and there will be sellers. This thread will get many arguments and people will argue limit less. For me both are good. Though I prefer to use it cashless cause it's convenient and it's easy. Though sometimes I hold it to. So it's difficult to say which one is right. It's every one discretion, you should add a vote.