Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
by
SuperClam
on 12/01/2017, 17:51:37 UTC
Quote from: cozie on January 11, 2017, 10:21:34 AM
Quote from: SuperClam on January 11, 2017, 10:13:20 AM
Quote from: cozie on January 11, 2017, 10:04:21 AM
Quote from: SuperClam on January 11, 2017, 09:54:33 AM
Quote from: cozie on January 11, 2017, 09:41:59 AM
Quote from: malafaya on January 10, 2017, 07:49:41 PM
Quote from: cozie on January 10, 2017, 07:05:41 PM
Quote from: SuperClam on January 10, 2017, 04:08:12 AM
Quote from: cozie on January 09, 2017, 09:22:02 PM
thank you for your reply
help not contain any of combineany, splitsize or combinelimit
I can only see them in init.cpp as you said, seems to me that can only be specified as args of clamd, correct?
You can also put them in your clam.conf file.  
You should also be able to add them to the target field of a shortcut on windows as well, I believe.
thank you Smiley
another info, is ok that "weight" in "getstakinginfo" is always the same and not increase his value (at least not in 4 days)?
AFAIK the "weight" in the Clam wallet is the same as the number of CLAM coins staking.
n00b question: this way stacking is only luck? there isn't something like a score system (more time you are stacking more score you gain)?
You are correct.  
'Staking' on CLAM doesn't take into account the age of the coins or the number of times those coins have staked.  
Coins must wait a period of time after each stake to ensure they are deeper in the chain before staking again - but, other than that, staking is a function of coin amount and difficulty.
so at this point try to stake with the claim from btc/ltc/doge blockchain is useless?
is better to have them all together?
Much like hash rate in a proof-of-work crypto: more is better.  
That said, the total balance staking is more important than the size of the individual outputs staking.  
Too many individual outputs and you might be inefficient due to the time it takes to check the outputs.
Too few individual outputs and you might be inefficient due to the percentage that are immature at a given time after staking.  
If you have a very small total balance, it might take a long time to get a stake (though the realized percentage increase when you do would be higher).
thank you Smiley
so let's assume i have ~100 CLAM, is better to have them in block of ~4.16 CLAM or not?
edit: is better to have all the CLAM in the same address or it does not matter?

It might make sense to split 100 CLAM into piles of something like 5 or 10. 
The idea is that when split up a smaller percentage is immature when you stake a block. 
However, going too small might be undesirable as it slows down the speed with which you can check them and they must also be gathered when you decide to send them.