Homero "throwing Fraser under the bus" does not ring true to me at all, either. I think this is all part of an extrication plan. Look at it this way: If a competent legal team went after Garza , they would nail him. That would officially make the Fraser/Garza partnership one involved in fraud schemes. Is it better to be accused of being involved in fraud and cleared? Or associated with proven fraud and left open for future litigation along with having a permanently tarnished business image? The smart money would go for being accused and cleared I think. After this designed to fail suit is tossed out/lost will there be another? Unlikely. Not a major one anyways. That is what I see happening here.