You said there are none, I present you reasons and you call them invalid. Its fun discussing with you.
Those are general reasons to have alts, not reasons to have alts in campaigns which is what I'm arguing against. Therefore, the first two are invalid.
A first time offender is warned with a 7 day ban.
#1 What is your first time offender warning period?
#2 How do you keep track of possible repeated offenders?
#3 How can those that have received it appeal the punishment?
Again, I'm uncertain as to what you're targeting with those question as I can not punish people in this way. Elaborate?
All I see is you evading my questions.
The answer can be intuitively deducted.
I agree, we need more mods able to handle this. If theymos thinks Lauda is fit for the job, they should make Lauda a global mod with the powers needed to do it.
It doesn't even matter who it is, as long as they are active and properly moderate.
Lauda agreed to go after managers, but instead keeps punishing campaigners.
No, I have not. I have brainstormed the idea which didn't take off.
Lauda agreed to make a thread explaining their 'rules' for these ratings and how to get rid of them, they did not.
It is on the TODO list.
Keep in mind that Lauda themselves is in this current position of power (DT & Staff) because an admin lifted their ban (for spam). I dont think something like this is possible with the way Lauda currently handles the situation.
It was not lifted; I have served out my ban. I'm not sure what relevance that has with the 'way that I currently handle the situation'.