Well I guess we are not the only one seeing how unethically the misuse of ICO funds is.
Just out of curiosity, what is your opinion of Lisk Ico Funds being used for ByteBall distribution?
Personally I think it is fine since it is Btc that has been donated to Lisk and therefore their Btc.
I think You didn't read that the byteballs were obtained FREE in the initial distribution, and you must not have been paying attention to it when they had the ico. All you had to do was link a BTC address, not spend BTC. Absolutely no ico funds were used there.
I think you didn't read that of what you were responsing to. Because you just agreed with Litcoincollector who you were replying to and disagreed with Bitbanksy.
The point LitcoinCollector was trying to make is that ICO (TEC) participants have no (or very limited) right to decided how the funds are used after, but BitBanksy doesn't think so.
Other tried to make the point repeatedly that ARK voting with the TEC lisk is somewhat similar to how Lisk used BTC to participate in ByteBall distribution as both was to the advantage of the project and it's teams while doing so was possible without spending the funds on these not directly project development events. But BitBanksy disagreed.
So you just delivered an explanation of how ByteBall distribution worked to make a point that didn't needed to be made, only to BitBanksy.