This is a joke right? Shadowcash was deanonymized by xmr dev in one day because sdc devs don't know first thing about how ring signatures work. Tor is also poor privacy network, which is why xmr is including i2p integration instead. zeroknowledge proofs are a bad thing in crypto because they are a trusted-setup technical failure. "SPEC is the most private and anonymous cryptocurrency network today." - this is quite a statement with zero technical reasoning.
You certainly know how to embarrass yourself @scaryvirus by claiming technical knowledge, do some basic research before you attempt to FUD and you will find that
(1) Yes, SDC was deanonymised by XMR devs which was widely publicised, or rather a tech fault was pointed out.
https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/issues/25#issuecomment-183024476(2) The bounty was paid by the SDC team after they acknowledged the error and worked with XMR devs on a fix
https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/issues/25#issuecomment-189946249(3) The SDC team implemented a fix in the Phoenix - v1.4.0.0 of SDC in March 2016 and the ring signatures have been implemented correctly ever since.(4) SPEC was created with the ring-signature fix already implemented and so has never had this issue
(5) The SPEC implementation of Tor will mean a fork so that no exit node is ever used and the entire network is hidden. There is no bleed through to the clearnet. Tor has a much larger user base and scalability and the primary function is simply to obscure the IP address of the user in case of an attack. The actual anonymity features are within the SPEC code. It is simply an extra layer of obfuscation to make an attack harder. You will find it hard on technical grounds to argue that I2P is better at hiding you IP than Tor. It is not impossible that we might also implement I2P or let you choose when you run the wallet.
So, please educate yourself @scaryvirus or at least do some basic research before you attempt to FUD...