he is on record claiming its ok turning bitcoin into paypal 2.0 if that is the result of getting a blocksize thats big enough to guarantee fast cheap onchain transactions.
did you even read the article and calmly understand the context.
he said he would gladly let core have their LN (paypal2.0) if it meant core would let the community have dynamic blocks to grow bitcoins main net naturally.
meaning making LN(paypal2.0) voluntary side service bcause there would be enough room on the mainnet for both..
and not what core wants, which is
a compulsory offchain commercialised service which core want due to core restricting natural scaling of the mainnet to force people offchain.
WAKE THE HELL UPactually understand the reality of the world.
its core that want to make the commercialised offchain permissioned service. (paypal2.0 aka LN HUBs)Core/Blockstream and their people don't pay attention to such details. They just like to blindly follow their leaders into the fire and relentlessly defend them to the end. Understanding any of this is not part of their role.
The whole story about large block causing centralization and the need for some very crazy changes to the entire network (that's an alt) like Lightning is only going to be bought by very blind sheep.