Re: [ANN] [XMR] Monero, monnaie anonyme à signature de cercle
Bonjour,
1/
J'utilise encore le portefeuille "monero.win.x64.v0-10-0-0.zip", je suis supris de voir que "monerod.exe" se synchronise bien et que "monero-wallet-cli.exe" me permet d'ouvrir mon wallet (wallet ici pour dire "mon compte") et de consulter mon solde.
Normalement, si le hard fork a bien eu lieu, on devrait me forcer à passer à "monero.win.x64.v0-10-1-0.zip" ?
Pourquoi ca marche encore ?
2/ Je chercher à trouver les défauts de XMR (et c'est pas facile
).
Le probleme n'est pas la taille que cela prend sur les disques dur. Mais bien la synchronisation de la blockchain entre les full nodes.
En technologie bitcoin, a ma connaissance, les gens qui disent qu'ils peuvent dégraisser un arbre de Merkle, veulent juste dire qu'on peut enlever les blocs/branches orphelins. Mais il est impossible de toucher à la chaine la plus longue.
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/monero-successfully-hardforks-increase-privacy-anonymity/
1/
J'utilise encore le portefeuille "monero.win.x64.v0-10-0-0.zip", je suis supris de voir que "monerod.exe" se synchronise bien et que "monero-wallet-cli.exe" me permet d'ouvrir mon wallet (wallet ici pour dire "mon compte") et de consulter mon solde.
Normalement, si le hard fork a bien eu lieu, on devrait me forcer à passer à "monero.win.x64.v0-10-1-0.zip" ?
Pourquoi ca marche encore ?
2/ Je chercher à trouver les défauts de XMR (et c'est pas facile
).Le probleme n'est pas la taille que cela prend sur les disques dur. Mais bien la synchronisation de la blockchain entre les full nodes.
En technologie bitcoin, a ma connaissance, les gens qui disent qu'ils peuvent dégraisser un arbre de Merkle, veulent juste dire qu'on peut enlever les blocs/branches orphelins. Mais il est impossible de toucher à la chaine la plus longue.
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/monero-successfully-hardforks-increase-privacy-anonymity/
Quote
One average monero transaction takes more than 4kb of space, increasing to around 6kb per transaction with RCT, compared to an average of 400 bytes per bitcoin transaction.
The nearly three years old currency already has a blockchain of around 10GB while barely having any transactions around 2,600 a day, compared to bitcoins more than 250,000 a day. At bitcoins transaction levels Monero would add 1.5GB per day, consuming an average laptop disk space of 500GB in one year.
Although storage is relatively cheap with terabyte disk sizes now becoming more common, initial node synchronization may eventually become a problem, but the network is considering Lightning and TumbeBit, a more private version of Lightning, for more scalability, according to Othe, a pseudonymous Monero core developer. They have no plans to implement Segwit, Othe says, as the currency doesnt have any transaction malleability problems and further consider sharding to be a failed concept.
The nearly three years old currency already has a blockchain of around 10GB while barely having any transactions around 2,600 a day, compared to bitcoins more than 250,000 a day. At bitcoins transaction levels Monero would add 1.5GB per day, consuming an average laptop disk space of 500GB in one year.
Although storage is relatively cheap with terabyte disk sizes now becoming more common, initial node synchronization may eventually become a problem, but the network is considering Lightning and TumbeBit, a more private version of Lightning, for more scalability, according to Othe, a pseudonymous Monero core developer. They have no plans to implement Segwit, Othe says, as the currency doesnt have any transaction malleability problems and further consider sharding to be a failed concept.