@Yahoo and other DT members: I wish to know if this thread is only to track alts of spammers or even scammers?
I'm not a Lord of Time, nor I am Yahoo or other DT member, but I actively participate to this thread, and I hope to clarify this matter with my honest contribution:
"Account farming manufacture" as defined by TL in your trust wall, doesn't only involve accounts trading: it involves an active participation in the "business" those accounts are traded for. There are rings of alts created for scam reasons, other rings for signature campaign's payments sake. Both are actively fought on this forum at different levels: some DT members are shooting at the "trading" part (see KWH and Vod for example), others are shooting at the "spam" part (see Lauda i.e.), others (not DT even) are putting their effort on the rings connections over multiple accounts.
The trust left on your wall by Timelord2067 clearly says: "Actively participating in the wholesale manufacture and sale of Farmed Accounts TM by providing text for said UID's for payment. "
IMHO the feedback stands, for the following reasons:
1.- the "Trust" sections is a very personal corner where I can put my feedback to any user so that I can have a visual situation (trust score) of that user personal "trust" for future references. If I give you a positive feedback, would anyone be able to see your trust score changes? No. The changes on your trust score are visible only by my account, and it is for my personal reference only. My feedback is under the "untrusted feedbacks" category in your profile and under the "trusted feedbacks" category in mine. There is another sections of the "Trust": the DT members. If anyone on DT1 thinks the feedbacks I left over multiple accounts are right and helpful for other users, they might decide to include me in their Trust list: by that moment I become a DT2, and my feedbacks would affect everyone trust score. TimeLord20167 is not on DT2 hence he is expressing his rights to "not trust" you and wrote it on your wall for his future reference.
2.- let's dig into it: signature campaigns are an added value of this forum by the owner and the staff are starting to not condone some behaviors of signature campaign's participants and managers. In this thread, it is very well explained:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1684035.0The activity of "providing text" to signature campaign participants upon payments is not something that should be condoned, accordingly to those guidelines:
Due to the unacceptable level of spam and low-quality posts signature campaigns generate
reading your "paid" posts you published on I have a hard time to define those posts "high quality" or worth to pay for them either (i read you even invested > supported HYIP....)
Signature campaigns should be a way to reward users for quality contributions, and only those that do should be paid
Doing the contrary (posting so I get paid) is exactly what is not going to be tolerated here anymore. The fact you login on the forum just because you HAVE to post, so you get paid for, is not what is being requested and some Campaign Managers like SMAS i.e. are actively contributing to fight this. Your "job," was exactly like that.
hilariousandco clearly states this concept
generally it is quite easy to spot a spammer posting only for payment
He calls them "spammers" without digging in their posts quality: spammer tags earned just because you post only for payment
Your participation to the CEG5952 which has been both a spammer and a scammer is an active participation to the farming of their accounts for the sake of signature payments, and you actively participated to that account manufacture by providing them text for their posts. You are a part of the process.
IMHO (as this entire post), TimeLord2067's feedback stands.
~Gun