I understood the argument, no problem. Here it is again.
He's claiming that it's easy for people to see through the conspiracy theorist bullshit (the bible in his example) because anyone can and should read (the science) and are easily able to realize it's legitimate?
The Internet has leveled the playing field for science, so that I can read technical articles on climate change.
This statement is sadly wrong.
Reading doesnt mean you understand it.
The case is that most people (non scientist) dont understand the math, physics, biology, chemistry etc involved and therefore dont get the whole picture.
Majority of people on this planet dont have more then basic school education.