Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
iamnotback
on 25/01/2017, 14:06:41 UTC
Just because he wrote that, doesn't mean that everyone who thinks religion is unfalsifiable is a Marxist.
....
Marxism is not just about the claim that religion is an illusion.

No it just means they have some Marxist inclinations. That they agree with Marx on some issues. A true Marxist is someone who agrees with Marx on all or most issues.

Thus you iamnotback have some Marxist inclinations but since you disagree with Marx on many other issues you are most definitely not a Marxist  Grin

The more salient point is that Marx first removed religion and then replaced it with the religion of social justice. Thus your Marxist leanings are more severe than mine because you have religious vacuum that you are trying to fill (you offered the necessity of social justice for fixing slavery for example) and afaics this makes you ideologically vulnerable.

I am rather denying to have any religion or ideological position. I don't believe I can fix nature. Instead I think I need to have a rational plan for a culture that works and can scale out and which can't be defeated because it will be decentralized. It only requires teaching the young males some truths about nature which they must 100% respect.

If they don't respect those truths, then they will destroy the culture and themselves. Those offspring which fail to uphold the truths, will be naturally selected out.

I don't believe fear of a God is necessary. Rationality will work if men stop being ideological sponges.

Young men need a clear, unequivocal battle plan for their life goal and purpose. And the mothers must be prevented from polluting their minds and spoiling them.

Weak men will not be comfortable with this. And thus they are enslaved. r0ach if you want to waste your time trying to save weak men from themselves, then you will be pulled down with them.