Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
SatoNatomato
on 29/01/2017, 20:53:48 UTC
Quote from: tonych on January 29, 2017, 08:31:07 PM
Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on January 29, 2017, 03:07:28 PM
Quote from: drays on January 29, 2017, 02:41:51 PM
If that is not enough, here are more seditious words: "blackbyte", "bad distribution", "better than iota", "very similar to iota", "actually the same" Grin.

This post reminded me to ask: Was there a peer review of "private untraceable payments"* claim?

---
* - taken from the title

I proposed similar idea in bitcoin-dev mailing list and it was discussed there.  One of the responses is from Peter Todd https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-August/012956.html, see others too.

Also there was a technical discussion at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1574508 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1298588.0
So far, at least 1 non-founder-affiliated JavaScript developer (me) has gone through the code looking for obvious major mistakes and found none.