While I did not think you have been especially vocal about those who evade bans and break forum rules in the past, I was not sure of just how vocal you have been above those who were evading bans and breaking rules. So I decided to gather some statistics about the last ~3 months of your posting history.

Ending as of when you made your first thread about zeroaxl and starting on the last day of October 2015, you have made 149 posts, of which, 79 have been in Meta. Your posts in Meta can be broken down as follows:

• 16 Defending Lauda
• 11 Trust System
• 3 Activity
• 4 Signature Campaigns
• 3 Rule Breaker
• 2 Centralization of Forum
• 5 Clarification of rules
• 1 Units of Evil System
• 2 Broad Discussion of the Forum
• 2 May 2015 Hack
• 1 New Sub
• 2 Banned Rank
• 1 Timing of New Forum Software
• 2 Number of accounts some people have
• 2 Locking Threads/Deleting Posts
• 2 Account Recovery
• 4 Troubleshooting
• 2 Self-Admitted Off Topic Post
• 1 Avatar
• 2 Ranks (existing)
• 1 Revealing Email to Mods When Reporting a Post
• 2 New Global Mod
• 1 Number of Reports
• 1 Stake New Bitcoin Address
• 1 Time Spent on Forum
• 3 Spam Bots

I also checked all the threads in Meta whose last post was on or after October 31, 2016. Out of 382 threads, there are 31 threads that involve a ban appeal and/or a ban request and/or a specific ban. Of those 31 threads, you posted in 5 of them. Your posts in these 5 threads can be broken down as follows (ignoring all posts you made after you created your first zeroaxl thread):

• Girlbtc.com related threads - 3
• Did not discuss the ban - 1
• Did not support the ban request - 1

With as many posts as you are making defending/supporting Lauda (20 in the last 3 months in Meta, 24 in Meta/Reputation), it is easy to understand why you were creating a thread that would have helped Lauda's extortion attempt.

In conclusion, I see very little evidence that you have been strongly against those who evade bans, and only a small amount of evidence that you are against those who break the forum rules. Over the last 3 months, the only person you really tried to get for ban evasion was girlbtc.com. If you were to ask me, I would say that the evidence does not support that you are strongly against those who evade their bans.

---

---

Showing my work

---

Page breakdown on topics you discussed in the relevant timeframe. You made one post while I was looking at page 5 of your post history, and deducted one post from page 6 which I also looked at on page 5 to avoid counting the same post twice. Each post is only given one topic.

Breakdown of threads in Meta discussing a specific ban:

List of threads discussing a specific ban. Those with an "*" are those that you posted in