Re: Is the point of view for newbies brutal while for trusted members guys are blind
The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.
It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off"
It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off"
Oh FFS, post with your main fucking account, enough of your alt charades. Why haven't you bothered to post neg trust for Lauda from this puppet account, you filthy hypocrite? If you're trying to coerce others into your trust games at least make it look like you care.
tl;dr: yes, please fuck off. Thank you.
There are plenty of warnings about Lauda going around already, I just find it strange that those who make a hobby out of aggressively negging the not-so-innocent have not yet done so with Lauda. Some even negged the person in my above example who did the exact same thing as Lauda did
Wow, a PMS joke... I bow to your wit.
Let me spell it out so you could be sure: you, referred to as "filthy hypocrite" above, as well as the OP of this thread - let's refer to him/her as "filthy spammer" - have not posted neg feedback for Lauda yet you're both advocating for OTHERS to do that. Post your negs, case closed, fuck off (I feel I may be repeating myself here). If you feel that's not enough - create some more sockpuppet accounts, post more negs, you can even network them into trust lists and get Lauda to -9999.