I actually disagree. The screening process for content should be centralized. People love to rave about decentralized blockchain postings but this only leads to spam and network ddos attacks.
I can think of several IP/copyright agencies who would. Also several white knights who think banning cloning of files is the moral thing to do. Network ddos won't work against PoS. Decentralized blockchain was created specifically to prevent censorship such as in the cases of copyright enforcers trying to silence copies of files and links to copies of files to enact their belief that copying files is a crime. Decentralized also means it can function without the devs - if they disapear the chain goes on. Community voting and sorting would be much better long term. If their identities are ever revealed, they would be the weak point in this chain on a centralized chain and not on decentralized. This isn't like most projects on ethereum that have no business to be decentralized, this is extremely the exact type of scenario that requires decentralization to survive.
I like devs approach too, but more from centralized version running NOW and decentralized LATER, with ideally the wallet becoming the alternative always working decentralized interface. It also makes sense for them to do the screening now since the project is still young and needs work to be self sustainable. And being able to check out the website, with working ipfs, is incredible.