Go be bored somewhere else, then. All you have left is an endless barrage of insults and a
tribalist mentality that causes unnecessary friction and polarisation. Anyone who isn't with you is against you and there's no happy middle-ground or compromise. I've already said we should implement SegWit and also have Lightning as an option where it's appropriate, but you still just want to attack everything and everyone if anyone even dares to utter the word 'blocksize'. Triggered much?
And no, I'm not going to conveniently disappear in the event of a controversial hardfork, because I would much rather see a unified approach where the majority agree where the blocksize limit should be set and we all move forward
together.
You're the proud bannerman of the fork-off brigade who takes great delight in the prospect of one tribal group crushing the other. Admittedly there may have been periods where I was sick of your (and ice, brg, davout, hdbuck, etc's)
hardliner crap and thought maybe it would be best if two chains went their separate ways, but I'd rather see unity. I will continue to call for compromise and a consensual fork, not a bilateral split. And even in the event of a split, I certainly won't be shorting any chains. I'm afraid whatever happens you're stuck with me.
It's really simple: don't turn up into Bitcoin, proposing to change the parts of Bitcoin that keep Bitcoin safe, then accuse the original Bitcoiners of tribalism when they dare to voice opposition! You're retarded if you really believe this nonsense