Craig Wright was the closest person to place evidence that he is nakamoto.
Not only is this false (he has not provided a single shred of evidence, when it would be easy for the real Satoshi to provide near-incontrovertible evidence), but the exact opposite is true: *substantial* evidence has been provided that he was falsifying data in an attempt to prove he was Satoshi.
Notice that it's often segwit haters that tend to believe Craig Wright was satoshi nakamoto for some reason? I wonder what the deal is behind that. Maybe Craig Wright will eventually be back with more "satoshi proof" trying to trick people into BU, after all Gavincoin is always involved in anything that wants to get Core out of the main branch.
Yes, perhaps, and also the correlation may be due to a lack of judgement or patience to look into the details, even a lack of critical thinking skills ... (I mean seriously, some people are taking the fact that he refuses to offer evidence as some kind of proof it's him
)