1500BTC minimum would be quite hard to achieve given the high rate of bitcoin.Also people like to diversify their investment portfolio so they do not put all their eggs in one basket.I think the minimum limit should be adjusted with high bitcoin price
@zahra4577: We think 1,500 BTC is fair and necessary to develop the features we're looking to build. It may be adjusted slightly if BTC takes a sharp turn upwards, but at this point, we will keep it at 1,500 BTC.
Yes 1,500 btc is a little bit suspicious. That is so much money. Sorry but I can't see how you can justify that. That is just crazy. You will never have to work ever again with that kind of money.
For major projects 1,500 BTC is not too big some projects ICO can collect 2,000 BTC in 2 days so why not
What is needed now is an optimistic look at how the market reaction to this project
Aim high, who knows the project will just get what it needs to proceed with the project. I would like to see as well what the team can deliver given they raise the minimum or if they get the maximum or somewhere in between.
@menace.bit: The more we raise the longer we will have funding for and will implement more features on our roadmap. 1,500 BTC will sustain our team for about a year and after that, funding will probably run out.
So if you only raise the minimum, that mean you will only deliver up to Q1 2018 Credit Score? And when funding runs out, what will happen? Abandon project or you will try to raise more funds thru another ICO or you sell (or dump) the 10 million allocated to the team to continue further with development?
@menace.bit: We will try our best to meet as many milestones as we can given the funds we get from the crowdsale. When funds run out, we will encourage the community to take over if the team can no longer work full time on the project. We may revert to part time work.
Most likely, there will no additional token sale because we are selling 80% of the total tokens.