Nine Accounts Connected:

Muhammed Zakir, numanoid, iflewtoday32 -1: -1 / +1, chronicsky, justinetime, MarkMJ -4: -2 / +0, Vaskiy, Quickerseller, ACCTVendor,

Background:

The classic multiple alts including one with negative trust with a twist, this includes a farmed account slapped with neutral trust from the alt known as quickseller *and* two UID's that impersonate said scammer and a direct connection to master-P

Proof:

It starts with this thread:  [WTB] Full Member Accounts[closed] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1037785.0 26 April 2015, 01:19:45 http://archive.is/nviSz

quickseller sets up a thread to buy UIDs from others. 


chronicsky has 25 such accounts on offer:


The deal is then done:

---

Originally when looking at this, I believed chronicsky 09 July 2014, 19:57:28 Date Registered:    u=353680 http://archive.is/D96uN was a farmed account in the same batch as quickseller, 22 July 2014, 15:51:40 Date Registered:    Quickseller u=358020 and was sold to an unknown fairly early on by one of the alts - possibly 20 July 2014, 05:29:56 Date Registered:    ACCTseller u=357263 and then quickseller (actual quickseller not an alt) slapped them with red paint - a tactic I've theorised previously where quickseller will sell a UID via an alt, then slap it with red paint as a DT then sell more UIDs because the first UID is now unmarketable.

I've seen four or five threads now where quickseller is trying to buy member and above UID's around this time-frame, at first I thought it was a ruse to create trust walls for UIDs that traded (which would actually be quickseller' alts s/he'd then sell with in built green trust)

The same day QS buys alts *from* chronicsky in one thread http://archive.is/nviSz then apparently is selling them back in another thread started 12 hours later http://archive.is/xSn3j just doesn't make sense...

http://archive.is/xSn3j#selection-543.0-543.38

This occasion however, quickseller leaves neutral trust for chronicsky having backed out of an auction (remember it's just 12 hours after they traded the other way)  See the second to last line of this post for the likely explanation of the neutral not negative trust given by quickseller...

In our time-frame, we already have the account was created 09 July 2014, 19:57:28 and was sold prior to 26 April 2015, 01:19:45 when the above twin exchanges took place.

---

I would say the sale of the UID took place prior to 20 March 2015, 01:49:54 as chronicsky stakes both a wallet address and a PGP key:

http://archive.is/08wwo#selection-5305.0-5534.0

Verified with this --> https://tools.bitcoin.com/verify-message/


chronicsky stakes the wallet address 1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G above and uses it on multiple occasions:

01 September 2014, 22:44:56 Thread use Archive 03 September 2014, 15:41:31 Thread use Archive 01 April 2015, 13:42:37 Thread use Archive 09 June 2015, 21:08:25 (Post 666  ) Thread use Archive orryde also posts on the same page a little further down (12 posts to be exact)

At this point we can safely say that chronicsky uses wallet address 1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G both before their trade with (and trust slap down by) quickseller and months after, but we need to look at another couple of their uses:

http://archive.is/pkieM#selection-6885.0-6904.7


20 July 2014, 05:29:56 Date Registered:    ACCTseller u=357263
20 July 2014, 06:40:20 Date Registered:    deluxeCITY u=357282
21 July 2014, 01:31:08 Date Registered:    Panthers52 u=357487
22 July 2014, 15:51:40 Date Registered:    Quickseller u=358020

The only two explanations are "quickseller" has never actually sold the UID chronicsky (remember it was there first by 13 days), or, sold the UID chronicsky and threw in the wallet address 1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G as part of the sale.  For reasons which will become apparent later in this post, I now feel the accounts were created at the same time and divvied up by two separate users.

But hang on, Muhammed Zakir u=320943 also uses Wallet Address 1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G to receive funds from MrDjAK u=164082 in this thread that orryde bumps:

Thread use Archive

Look to this page:

https://blockchain.info/address/1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G?offset=5000&filter=6 not quite half way down, the times are GMT/UTC and is the *only* BTC 0.085 transaction around that time.

1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G receives the BTC 0.085 from MrDjAK in this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/c8c92aed4bc7f026f27e978599e13dc4f94d695d43265c0e7b69273de331aa98


Muhammed Zakir u=320943 *must* be chronicsky, or rather chronicsky must be Muhammed Zakir because it was created first.

MrDjAK buys accounts from both Muhammed Zakir and chronicsky if their trust wall is to be believed:


(Not bad receiving positive trust from monbux who acted as escrow when they ordinarily will only give positive for BTC 0.25 trades):

monbux: http://archive.is/d7qkL#selection-505.35-505.101


monbux: http://archive.is/kgAuY#selection-509.35-509.127


chronicsky is also paid by Muhammed Zakir for being in a signature campaign Thread use Archive - and also here: Thread use Archive - is that trust abuse or just deception like quickseller being both the seller and the escrow?  Either way I find that untrustworthy taking two slices of the pie.

---

girlbtc.com u=458172 states on the 13 May 2015, 05:15:11 that numanoid u=333524 uses the Wallet Address 1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G to receive funds from their gambling site:

Thread use Archive


numan's being numanoid u=333524 who is the fifth post prior in this thread. Thread use Archive in numanoid's post they say they deposited BTC 0.5 and in the above transaction, they receive BTC 0.54 back.

Related Addresses:

Muhammed Zakir, numanoid and chronicsky all use Wallet Address 1LCjVo8go5rD2AGd6tQS1bALpcVrry4n3G it is part of Wallet [1a210eb353] https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/1a210eb35313f511/addresses and there are twelve wallet addresses, they are:


*No Links
*Red Colour in my posts specify the account is tagged by the DT

• 1SkyS6hDjV85cvGAneEBAG3koQEL1S5pN is used by chronicsky Thread use Archive just one post prior to ACCTseller... 
• 1BUTeqFDgm3vByQKJzppiayDhttDtXRKcw is used by justinetime u=374856 Thread use Archive just one post prior to [BTC]onFIRE
• 1Bf4oKbHTMChShtKnUimKmmpDyPHzKjVRB is used by Vaskiy u=452049 Thread use Archive
  
  Vaskiy u=452049 is identified as being an alt of MarkMJ u=382490 -4: -2 / +0 through their shared use of wallet address 112RyTsEkxcj1wxrrK58RCgELL1pWyrpk3 Thread use Archive
  
  Although tarsua u=387574     -16: -4 / +0 identifies the connection, it's hard to say if Vaskiy was bought or even loaned out...
• 1Bqwcgtd52UoBibPXa3bNa1mi4CicFPvou is used by iflewtoday32 u=343767 -1: -1 / +1 Thread use Archive (just three posts prior to ACCTseller u=357263 and Thread use Archive
  
  According to their trust wall, iflewtoday32 u=343767 -1: -1 / +1 was a part of the Master-P scam...
  
  
  Quote
  NLNico 30: -0 / +3   2015-12-29   0.00000000 Reference   Has 2 scam accusations that he didn't even reply to from 3 months ago: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169473.msg12399193#msg12399193
  
  In addition tried to make 2 trades, both got escrowed by Master-P, but iflewtoday32 never replied. One of these is related to the "Master-P scam":
  - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306734.0;all
  - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1296583.0;all
  
  I will reconsider this feedback if issues are solved.
• 168sKDri6ryRMd9eB1SPnUNKT63ZDe44Yc 19c8f2sbpehQXxcCwdEhyfF9VNMRaPxJEU 1DRFQ6vhxnHcbbTkVqNS5jnkjpyQm2J6mR 1MVbzeihRUAz82pemkEJv2QEFr9zYbvV7B 155mcRmqWZ3SpT2PufYASoreJ4rnch6H8c 16mEBbDEkkUUFEJSV6paXsTHRkuV8sKbYH 18YG5W5XvMFP33hqdb6VfCiuomecFGLqXT not used on BCT

Miscellaneous:

April 2015 was something of a disaster of a month for quickseller:

30 March 2015, 05:04:45 Last Active:    Raxe.io u=301032 http://archive.is/Wsnlk

14 April 2015 07:29 twister PGP Key-ID: 10D6C071 Fingerprint: A21FC33F959108C468E27A4C99001E4D10D6C071 created (no expiry date)

16 April 2015 16:42 bitbaby PGP Key-ID: 2D5D64ED Fingerprint: B582B27ECB1236D00447139689ECC1472D5D64ED created (no expiry date)

?? 24 April 2015, 05:02:35 Date Registered:    sasa9 u=508388

26 April 2015, 01:19:45 trade between quickseller and chronicsky

?? 26 April 2015, 03:28:42 Last actual active antiviruseller u=497628 http://archive.is/H6VhK

26 April 2015, 12:35:38 quickseller wants to sell account - chronicsky gets neutral trust for not completing trade...

27 April 2015, 21:27:29 Date Registered:    ACCTVendor u=509119 http://archive.is/1rgdR

28 April 2015, 22:21:09 Date Registered:    Quickerseller u=509376 http://archive.is/HIygf

28 April 2015, 22:26:57 Quickerseller starts thread Quickseller left himself positive trust using an alt account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1040812.0 naming deluxeCITY u=357282 as an Alt...  http://archive.is/0ussJ

29 April 2015 ACCTVendor 's Wallet Address    1EM9r5asZjeCpsFSCDNgrbpnnQm87pCs6M is used for one day only - sends funds to 125rHyRa26RLXXPXvvmfcXEg3BAUNhrvPQ part of Wallet [000306bb8b] https://blockchain.info/address/1EM9r5asZjeCpsFSCDNgrbpnnQm87pCs6M

29 April 2015, 23:09:57 Last Active:    Quickerseller u=509376

02 May 2015, 01:01:04 Last Active:    ACCTVendor u=509119 http://archive.is/1rgdR

It's very likely ACCTVendor u=509119 and Quickerseller u=509376 are alts of chronicsky (and therefore all the other UID's) who having received neutral (probably originally negative) trust from quickseller has a little sideswipe of their own in retaliation.

Likewise, quickseller gives Muhammed Zakir neutral trust.


The irony being it was for a late loan to chronicsky

In summary:

It's possible that quickseller sold master-P to Muhammed Zakir aka chronicsky aka iflewtoday32 u=343767 -1: -1 / +1 with the latter being caught in the crossfire then getting discarded.  Both know the other's participation in owning master-P hence, "quickseller" is reluctant to give negative trust else they are exposed.

Which would explain why REAL-master-p, jonesz, REAL-master-p2 had so much trouble explaining the payment / purchase of the master-P account ie, quickseller would expose themself as being the seller.