There are many people doing many different strategies for their lives and offspring. It is quite inspiring to see this.
What is actually the worst possible outcome is to have one strategy, religion, or culture adopted by everyone.
The reaction of white men against political correctness and woman's equality is a necessary reaction to the invasion of the monolithic groupthink over everything.
The backlash of the angry white man is merely the competition that nature requires to maintain sufficient diversity, resilience, and antifragility.
Again as I wrote to CoinCube weeks ago, there is no absolute truth other than the trend towards maximum entropy.
So feel free to have your God religion, but please keep it to yourselves lest we find ourselves competing over our respective differences in philosophy. Are we really at the point where we need to annihilate the other in order to be free to practice our own?
Again what pisses me off are those who do not respect the right of others to have their own personal power and strategy. Those people who think the know what is best for everyone else's children.
Edit: I wrote the above before reading CoinCube's post (and I didn't yet read all of his post), but obviously I was prescient predicting his error:
Knowledge has progressed and society is not returning to a conformation with less degrees-of-freedom. A society that enslaves and refuses to educate half of its population is simply uncompetitive over the long run.
If everyone does it one way, that is a reduction in entropy. If there is only one society (if such a monolithic groupthink was even sustainable), that is near 0 entropy.
If the diversity of men produced by not have political correctness mayonnaise dumped on top of them is greater by not educating their women, then that tribe may in fact prosper.
Neither I nor you know which strategy will be adapted to the unknown future. So that is why nature requires the antifragility of a diversity of strategies.