You, Sir, are obviously very new to the crypto game.  I am not.  I have seen hundreds of projects come and go, and I have seen common characteristics of projects that fail.   The number one characteristic of failed projects is this: they communicate too much because they are not doing any real work.   A perfect example is the Peertracks Project.  

Peertracks sounded very promising back in 2014 (it was basically supposed to be a crypto-powered music exchange platform), so I participated in the crowdsale.  They were constantly posting updates, but after awhile, it became very evident that no actual work was getting done.  Luckily, I bailed before the project collapsed.  You can see its current state here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?board=54.0  AND here:  http://peertracks.com/

So the frequency of updates is not the metric by which a project should be judged.  It should be judged by the actual work being done to bring the project to life.  For the Iconomi Project, you can see this in the Github screenshot below.  Nothing else matters.



By the way, btcrising, you've been added to my ignore list.   Have a great day!