Which is that the transaction code should not be stripped away.
You do realize that by putting the blockchain data on a 2nd layer, you are essentially creating a centralized database.
Why are you talking about a random proposal that just appeared recently, when I was not even defending/arguing said proposal? You're becoming a bigger waste of time than franky. It is clearly obvious that these kinds of discussions are way above your knowledge and current comprehension. You do realize that by putting the blockchain data on a 2nd layer, you are essentially creating a centralized database.
This only goes to show how determined the forces aligned against Bitcoin are: RealBitcoin is a pretty old account, and yet the account only turned into an anti-Bitcoin propaganda merchant in the last few months.
If you read about intelligence/espionage practices, this is a common strategy; it is effective because foolish people believe it when the agent refutes the allegation thusly: "Deep cover, for X NUMBER OF YEARS? You're paranoid/that's ridiculous". To increase effectiveness, increase the value of X.
So you say in the end it's only matter of price for what 'side' you might post.
May I ask you what BS did pay you ?
Just to find out what Ver needs to bring up...
