Exactly, either users need to admit when wrong (I've done it often, no big deal) or they need to go away,
I admit that I have no extensive technical knowledge on the subject.
But that doesn't mean that I cant ask questions or cant criticize things when I see a logical or methodical flaw in it.
My point was to defend against centralization, which is the core philosophy of bitcoin. If we abandon that, then the entire experiment is meaningless.
Stripping away core features, and introducing radical change, I believe is not in the best interest of the network, regardless of what the technical implementations are. What can I say, I am a conservative. I never see "change" as a good thing.
If the roadmap stinks, then no "hacking" or patching the code will make that OK.
If the roadmap tends toward centralization, then I simply cannot support it. Thats approach to Bitcoin.