See if you can describe your ideal Bitcoin, you know "the free marketplace of ideas, where all can have their voices heard above the ivory towers of the elitist developers", and that NOT sounding like a faint description of the Bitcoin Unlimited fork every single time you repeat it.
Already did, troll. I was talking to you. And it's perfectly reasonable.
Even you seemed to think so at one point. Ironically, your stance would be reasonable too if you weren't acting like such an unreasonable flailing crackpot in trying to force your views down the throats of others. The simple fact of the matter is, I don't care how traumatised you are by the existence of other clients and developers, they still have every right to exist and to continue doing what they're doing. The reason I'm perfectly happy for BU to exist is because I trust the consensus mechanism. Just because I question Core's direction, it doesn't mean I want BU to be governing the network, you spectacularly presumptuous arse. I think there should be an increase to the blocksize, I'd prefer it to be algorithmic if possible, but I'm happy for SegWit to be activated first if that's what it takes to get the hardliners like you to STFU.