You said "I don't think this [anti-Trump FUD] is going to help BTC's EFT at all" followed by two links.

In response, I asked "What does the anti-Trump FUD about Shkreli's friend have to do with the BTC ETF, and/or the inevitability of XMR ETFs?"

I didn't say anything assuming you'd reached any kind of conclusion about the ETF approval.  I just asked WTF your links about Shkreli's friend had to do with it; I didn't "argue" anything by asking that question.  Perhaps those critical thinking classes you teach should cover the concept of non sequitur!