so they take a million dollars in funds and abandon xc to get delisted even from bittrex?
time to do a more thorough investigation into dan metcalf.
even the smallest coins made effort to generate some volume to avoid delisting.
I will be creating a new thread in the main section to bring attention to this and investigate this more thoroughly.
Blocknet can not exist without XC. You can't abandon projects like this in crypto and be taken seriously.
As much as it sucks for XC to loose Bittrex, Blocknet still has XC for it's decentralized exchange and ongoing development as it seems.
Looking forward to synechist/atcsecure comments in this thread too.
@cryptohunter, I'll reply to this comment only. Your remarks are blatantly untrue and highly abusive. Please try to contain yourself in future.
We did not take a million. Look it up.
We have worked for over 2 years to create what we believe is the right approach to inter-chain infrastructure. Development has not stopped, and nothing has been abandoned.
I include XC here: it is under active development.
Regarding XC's delisting, you make unjustifiable assumptions about the cause of delistings, and unjustifiable assumptions about what keeps a coin listed. Perhaps get some experience before posting?
We continue to develop, support, and test, XC, and when the time is ripe for user adoption, then we may target this market. Until then, you can choose to support the project or leave it alone.
If you would like to see for yourself the work that is being done, and understand our goals for XC, then I'd encourage you to join its slack.