Besides the fact that you guys did not prepare basic informations like a Whitepaper, and besides the fact that you list a lot of "headline-incentives" to buy the ICO in the Ann without detailing it out to give more information which would give more trust, it's especially the way you react on questions that makes me suspicious. I see dishonesty in that. (...)
And the best idea is nothing if the team behind wouldn't be able to deliver or if the team behind acts dishonest. And you show both. Not saying that I believe you plan a scam. But I believe that the team behind this project has a clear priority to make money first and there is a lot of risk that there will be a lot of justifications later to not deliver. Or if, that it will also show this pattern: Rushed out, not thoughtful, not accurate, lazy, without strategy, and so on. (...)
We didn't listen!
Heat is a good example how revealing just communication can be. That's why I always suggest to focus on communication - not just the "talking-part" but everything what a team communicates and how it's done and sometimes even more important: what not. Every expression is communication and there is no communication without intention.
I personally never invest once I find what I call a "negative-pattern". Weaknesses are always to find, even in the best projects. Nobody is perfect. But negative patterns, like a lack of accuracy or clear signs of dishonesty or whatever, is usually a clear sign to stay away. Because there is a high probability that it not only will continue, but also have impact on a lot of other aspects of a project, that are not visible but would be important for success.