This is of course good council. However in this does not help those that did not do that.
Consider it as tuition; hope they learn their lesson for next time. You, of all people, having been around, should know this.
To be honest I am shocked you are still touching any of this.
I don't think this is personal, but I also don't think you are honest, or shocked. I get a contract, I fulfill the terms. That's what escrows do.
The rest of your post has been addressed by others.
I would expect you as and escrow and staff member to uphold this without question.
You've watched "The Transporter" ?
Rule Number 1: "Don't change the deal.", Rule Number 2: "No names", and Rule Number 3: "Never open the package."
When PV comes back, then those who left coins there can still use them there or withdraw them.
I would be creating a huge scam topic in the main section about this and keeping it on the first page.
You are free to do so. It is good to warn people about possible scams. Just make sure you back up what you say, and you actually make sense, otherwise not too many will take it seriously.
So let's here it right now will people with trapped vidz be able to hand over control of their accounts toward novus or not? yes or no
If you don't have the private key, you don't own the coins. That has been true since 2009.
the last question I'll explain why its so off.. lets say everybody contributes in the ICO with the same amount..
First round 30% is devided and 10 people contributed.. Means that 30% is devided over 10 people.
Second round only 2 people contribute, now this 20% will be devided over 2 person, which is more then the early investors got for their coins in the first round..
So the ICO is not for early investors beneficial its for people who want the take guesses and hope for the best.. Hence I think this round system with 30% and 20% is wrong and should be changed.. If there are way less people in the second round they will get more coins for less investment, but they were able to wait and sit back for way longer and are not the earliest people who helped the project.
If your example were to become true, then it would make sense for you to only participate in the second round, since you would get more. Everyone else will probably be thinking the same thing.
It is unlikely that your scenario, as you explain it, will happen that way. It is more likely that the first round will get 10 people, and the second round will get 20 people.