Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone
by
chronicsky
on 21/02/2017, 15:45:40 UTC
-snip-
chronicsky admits to the users I name as being their multiple alts. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17897854#msg17897854


i have already said that i sold the accounts and they weren't mine!

I never had them for myself or resale and profit purposes only.

So they don't count as my alts!
you have all the proof now and you still call them my alts.
Why don't you reply something about my post which is not related to topic with proper proofs?


ofcourse i left neg for you and thats not hostile , you left me wrong feedback even after i provided proper proofs. am just correcting it with posting how you are wrong..


Your images you claim to be proof have red-lines though various parts of the details around your so called "proof" (TX id / UID names etc) so the question is "What other information have you doctored in those images?"

You have the same affliction as quickseller in not being able to read; again, there is no shame in that, I didn't say you were an alt of quickseller (ask him/her I've had to correct them also).  If you really wanted to be of service to the BitCoinTalk community, perhaps you might like to provide information on who master-P and quickseller really are given that you have had numerous dealings with both? 

So that's the reason you're targeting me and pulling me in this mess?

the redlines are there to hide the buyers of the accounts as they haven't scammed anyone and i follow the rule if the person isn't using it to scam or hasn't scammed anyone , i won't disclose their identity.
I disclosed it in the case where it appears a trade with masterp-'s alt

Also i haven't had multiple dealings with them!

my only dealing with both of them is in the images

you're the one who doesn't know to read. I would have removed red if it was someone trusted but you will just mark them as alt of those people otherwise ...

so carry on with your non proof chants