Re: [IOTA] Крипто-токен для "интернета вещей" (Internet-of-Things)
Chat-for-Ban с юным падаванчиком в слэке продолжают банить неугодных.
Сегодня один чел имел наглость пожаловаться на почти двукратное падение цены ёты:
Чел успевает только сказать
Тем не менее критика ёты в других ветках всё же иногда заставляет Chat-for-Ban слезть с Олимпа и нет-нет да и преподать мастеркласс (это его собственное скромное определение следующих нескольких строк текста):
Сегодня один чел имел наглость пожаловаться на почти двукратное падение цены ёты:
Quote
Jason Lambert [12:12 PM]
i bought iota on slack because cfb said iota was hitting the exchanges soon (last August) lol. I bought at the peak which has since gone down nearly 50%.
Падаванчик вмешивается - мол о цене нужно говорить не в канале #general, а в #tradingi bought iota on slack because cfb said iota was hitting the exchanges soon (last August) lol. I bought at the peak which has since gone down nearly 50%.
Чел успевает только сказать
Quote
Jason Lambert [12:25 PM]
I'm just disappointed in cfb that's all
как тут жеI'm just disappointed in cfb that's all
Quote
Dominik Schiener [12:26]
lol I'll ban you
it's clear that you're just here to FUD
move on.
Но это "не понравилось" Chat-for-Ban:lol I'll ban you
it's clear that you're just here to FUD
move on.
Quote
Chat-for-Ban [12:28 PM]
I like banning my enemies personally...
I like banning my enemies personally...
Тем не менее критика ёты в других ветках всё же иногда заставляет Chat-for-Ban слезть с Олимпа и нет-нет да и преподать мастеркласс (это его собственное скромное определение следующих нескольких строк текста):
Quote
IOTA consensus and how it can be achieved if we are using Monte Carlo algorithm
Here green color squares are referenced (directly or indirectly) by ALL gray squares.
The main question that arises: - How can you achieve a consensus if Random Walk Monte Carlo algo gives different gray squares?
We see that green squares are referenced no matter what gray square was picked by the Monte Carlo
This is the nuance which some people don't see (and we don't emphasize because it's too obvious)
We come to consensus on the status of green squares only
More time passes - more transactions added - and eventually those white squares will be colored with green too
We don't know if young transactions are legit or not, but old ones are legit with very high probability (if they are referenced by the majority of tips returned by Monte Carlo)
That's it
https://forum.iota.org/t/iota-consensus-masterclass/1193Here green color squares are referenced (directly or indirectly) by ALL gray squares.
The main question that arises: - How can you achieve a consensus if Random Walk Monte Carlo algo gives different gray squares?
We see that green squares are referenced no matter what gray square was picked by the Monte Carlo
This is the nuance which some people don't see (and we don't emphasize because it's too obvious)
We come to consensus on the status of green squares only
More time passes - more transactions added - and eventually those white squares will be colored with green too
We don't know if young transactions are legit or not, but old ones are legit with very high probability (if they are referenced by the majority of tips returned by Monte Carlo)
That's it