it's actually a quotation of a scientific journal, but as I can see, you lack the competence to understand it.
is my assumption correct, that you didnt read for yourself but just guessed that this is a scam, because you simply dont understand it? really?
I understand it perfectly, it's jargon.
Don't assume anything, some of us have multiple disciplines in different science fields.
Just because you post from an abstract does not make it correct. Show me where the paper was challenged and the theory proven correct many times by different institutions. You won't be able to find any verifiable evidence because we don't even have such system to test such incomplete hypothesis.
Anyone with any knowledge on quantum computing can tell you we are very far from achieving it, the only way we have been able to observe this super position of quantum states has been when the quantum computing system was in sub-zero temperatures. And only then for very short periods of time.
If you can't explain it simply, then you obviously are just pulling jargon and abstracts you find with google out of your a**.
The alt-world is full of scams and hyped up promises, IOTA seemed ok until its emperor decided to act like a know it all and dismiss other's criticism.
Get off your sock puppet account and post from your real account CfB.
it's jargon!?
these abstracts are scientific standard and multiple times cited, used, crosstested etc. My first look revealed 25 further subjects. I used
www.sciencedirect.com (standard for scientific accepted articles, this is not google) and I needed 30s
https://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~yash/Naor_Shenhav_Wool.pdfhttp://users.wpi.edu/~teisenbarth/pdf/Festschrift.pdfhttp://www.ecrypt.eu.org/csa/documents/D2.3-SmallDevices-2.1.pdfhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/312407396_Surnaming_Schemes_Fast_Verification_and_Applications_to_SGX_Technologyhttp://ijns.jalaxy.com.tw/contents/ijns-v17-n3/ijns-2015-v17-n3-p311-321.pdfhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850938/...
you know PQcrypto? look at it.
http://pqcrypto.eu.org/official EU+scientist recommendations for post-quantum algorithms:
http://pqcrypto.eu.org/docs/initial-recommendations.pdfAnd you say we are very far away from building real quantum-compuuter:
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/3/2/e1601540.full.pdf-----------------------------------------------------------------------
you say "anyone with knowledge..." do you refer to real people, to academic results? show them and stop using phrases.
The alt-world is full of scams and hyped up promises, IOTA seemed ok until its emperor decided to act like a know it all and dismiss other's criticism.
Get off your sock puppet account and post from your real account CfB.
yes, the alt-world IS full of scammer, but IOTA is no scam, but you are butthurt and are too much of a coward to admit it.
and BTW. it takes 3 clicks to get info who I am. I'm not CFB and I'm using my real name in the IOTA ecosystem.
So if you have balls, sir, we can set up a nice interview where you can explain in an academic manner, why and how IOTA is a scam.
Beside phrases. Just proof. Should be extremely easy using your brains and your mouse to show us the magic insight instead of your worthless crybaby babbling.
So -> Interview on my blog, while using your real name, like I do.
Agreed?
BTW. fair terms. just scientific proof.