No intent to (unfairly/unduly

) smear you, but I haven't seen definitive proof your first suspension was for Gavin's email and not harassing Frap.doc (or both).
Would you like me to post screenshots of the admin's comments? (I'd prefer to to edit out their account name so no one harasses them; or only share it with you privately)
Had nothing to do with frapp, the post was harassing me by one of the zillion and one rbtc harassers. I think that one might have been go bitcoin but I'm not sure. In any case, frapp's name nor pseudonym were not mentioned there.
I'll take your word about the admin comments.
It just seemed ambiguous as to whether your initial ban was exclusively for the singular Gavin email post or whether that was the last straw given the long history of Frap.doc controversies (he has his own filter, lawl) context.
I'm more OK with the nullc ban than I thought I'd be. Let them stew in ignorant rage; Conde Naste doesn't deserve your free content.
The Grand Schism will be decided at the protocol and socioeconomic levels, not on the field of subreddit drama.
Now you have more time to out-develop the hell out of BU by making Core even more of a rapidly moving target.
Keep piling on great new features (esp. ones invaluable for miners) faster than BU can copy (and perhaps break) them.

Go Core go!
