The BS Core marketing campain in combination with reddit/bitcoin style has fully brainwashed some neutral individuals with the psychological and political useful trick to spread real fear about any HF.
I wonder how they could logically conclude that if SW is not enough for on-chain scaling there is need for a HF,... Later ? WTF ?
So the earlyier we do a HF the better and thanx to ETH we are alerted and prepared - we do better! But how on earth can this be done safely now at all with this psych fear anchor thrown ? I m really curious what this 'later' agenda looks like if BS Core needs to remove this fear by magic and initiate a good HF? SW yourself!
because the BS core army are deliberately talking about a harkfork umbrella term using the worse case bilateral fork subcategory.. with all the fake doomsdays and fake scares of calling anything not core an altcoin.
(ethereum was not a real hard consensus fork. it was a intentional hard bilateral fork)
later they will get some dude to magically wake people up and teach the community that CONSENSUS is different than BILATERAL(intentional) splits. and then reteach their sheep that a consensus fork was always possible and the BS core army can now do a consensus fork because they have now pulled some statistics out of their rear end that shows consensus is safe..
strangely the same as how 4mb is now magically safe even though 2mb was bad
they have a road map of scripts of when an how to reveal their plot. but i just want them to man up reveal their agenda and just bypass this crappy delay stuff and get on with a proper bitcoin hard consensus vote that allows real onchain growth