You are wrong. Firstly bitcoin CANNOT be Ideal Money.
I never suggested as much.
Secondly the relevant of bitcoin and john nash's lecture is such that bitcoin fits PERFECTLY as the premise which is an international e-currency with a stably issued supply that has an inflation rate that halves periodically.
I've read the Nash lecture and I don't see it.
You are confused, and I am not confused.
I guess I ain't gots 'nuff brains!
There was a fellow named Etlase2 who used to post here about money as measurement and tying a token's value to a basket of global commodities, et cetera. He, too, had it all figured out and I think he even tried to create his own thing. Maybe you can find a way to contact him. He used lots of big words and was always right! You two will get along great...