OK that makes sense with prior statements then.
but lets change "bitcoin's existence" with "other alternative" for clarity.

---

So, if bitcoin maintains current gold like properties, including not increasing
the TPS whether on-chain or off-chains, then:

(1) bitcoin will increase in value (YES)
(2) bitcoin is the "other alternative" due to increase in value. (YES)
(3) bitcoin cannot be the "ideal money" (YES)

(4) "other alternatives" existence is to force fiat to compete in value. (YES)
(5) "other alternative" ushers in the "ideal money". (YES)

(6) "Ideal money" is the end result of the competition. (?)
(7) "Ideal money" will be fiat money pegged to "Ideal gold" (?)

---

Check 6 and 7, do you agree? If so, explain the "Ideal gold" more since I
do not think you have explain in depth prior.