Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB)
by
AngryDwarf
on 07/03/2017, 21:19:17 UTC
Is it not the case that segwit coded as a hard fork would mean that all UTXO's can be spent with segwit? No stupid network topology introduced like with the soft fork mechanism? If so, then yes I think it would be accepted, unless someone things there are reasons why it would be a bad idea. Although my worry then would be that we would be fighting for the next capacity hard fork with no leverage.