Oh come on, half the sites you do promote don't have licences but it doesn't seem to put you off referring players to them.
Some have no licenses. But all sites I offer do not false and misleading claim to have one like bitsport.bet, do they?
False representation = criminal offense of fraud!
Curacao licences (which sadly seem to be virtually the only kind available to BTC operators) aren't worth the paper they are written on anyway.
BetBTC.co claim to have a Costa Rica license. Are they lying?
I don't know why you are having such a dig at these guys before they are even fully released, it looks like they are having a few teething problems and need to improve on their clarity a bit but they haven't done anything so bad it makes them worthy of being labelled a scam.
Read my posts in this thread. Which part are you not able to understand?
That false representation is a criminal offense?
That they blatant lie to the community?