I also invested in RaiBlocks.
If you only understood how horrendously flawed that design is.
I am interested to invest in raiblocks. How flawed is it ?
The dev is very active, so is there any chance of upgrade ?
I don't have access to my unpublished whitepaper at the moment wherein I summarized Raiblocks, and I am not sure I want to release that summary (yet) as I contrasted it against my design.
Suffice it to say that Raiblocks is insecure nonsense. You can locate TPTB_need_war's old debates with the creator (it used to be named block lattice).
@monsterer also pointed out the flaws (note @monsterer seems to be gone now)
Here is the part I am willing to publish now (some of it is redacted):
RaiBlocks had a separate partition (blockchain) for each user balance. Each user balance partition was an eligible witness voter for each transaction event. Consensus voting was required for transfers between partitions to prevent double-spends. The consensus ordering delegate set was the quorum on each epoch of voting, which was claimed to be final. There were alleged security flaws in this design
[^RaiBlocks-divergence], which is obvious given its consensus ordering set is
unbounded and has nothing-at-stake, which cant be secure per the generalized theory...
[^RaiBlocks-divergence] Shelby Moore III.
RaiBlocks divergence. Bitcointalk.org, Block lattice thread, post #4, Oct 24, 2015.