Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
Note,I've been a member here since 29 September 2013. I love BTC & BCT but you got me worried as any association with you would have tarnished the integrity of this forum.
You're a funny fruit... you're peddling work-from-home scams, shilling for paycoin, spreading blatant lies in this thread, and now you're worried about "association" and "integrity" because of someone's sarcastic remark?
Perhaps you could go back to being a vacuous shill and tell us if ionomy "incorporates" crypto in game(s). Bige086 says it does, WildShark says it doesn't, your vote could be a tiebreaker.
If one can use a crypto coin to get lives to play the game, does this not mean its incorporated. Or is it more of a matter of using the ionomy platform to use the ion to purchase lives. Whatever the issue, its clear that ionomy has done what no other coin has, we have a game on the play/apple store and you can use ions/electrons to play the games. Call it a clone all you want but some great stuffs been and is being developed. Hell we fixed some major problems with some of the code we incorporated. So stay tuned, we are just getting started (Im sure you will
)Well, then you might want to tell your shillbuddy WildShark to stop lying. He's the one saying "this is not a crypto project".
You will get the details when U share the bottle of scotch or when the game is finally released. You get closer to the Ionomy vision when stated this is not a crypto project!!! The Ionomy vision started to make sense to me after Huey taking 2 hours to explain it to the Whales present at the last hangout.
Keep up the good discussion of Ideas and THINK OUT OF THE CRYPO BOX!!!
Keep up the good discussion of Ideas and THINK OUT OF THE CRYPO BOX!!!
And no, it's not clear what exactly it is that "no other coin" has done. Surely you must have heard of Spells of Genesis for example? There are other projects too that are far more innovative than ionomy will ever be so you are going to have a hard time with that argument. Go for "prettiest PNGs" or something less obviously false.