First of all isn't proven that the developer premined before release, seems more a not properly distributed initial supply.
This great piece of inquiry is enough:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0Faking white papers, faking dates 2 years in advance, claiming a launch and dark market usage 2 years ago.
Bytecoin was launched in april 2014, claiming it was around since 2012, to "explain" that 80% was already (pre)mined.
Come on.
these are not proofs only suspects and conjectures, that are even legit if we have to discuss how transparent have been the developers, however you have ignored 99,9% of the post where I want to know in practice,
HOW is supposed to be better a developers that not premine but with emission enterely controlled by few people with big cluster miners against developers that "maybe" have premined a big slice however everyone was able to get a very large amount of units for free with faucets and an extremely low price
How many Monero you can get? At what price? Who is that sold you Monero? How this assure a better distribution in
real world?
First of all isn't proven that the developer premined before release, seems more a not properly distributed initial supply. Anyway even considering that developers have premined I would have agree with you if is proven that approach used by other coins assure most fair distribution. Unfortunately isn't the mined amount that decide this but how a common user can get a proportional percentage of the supply. Since the mining network can easily grab the most of supply forcing you to buy from them if you want some coin. Bytecoin was always easily mineable even from an home user with a notebook, was distributed for free in very large amount with faucets. Monero? If you want to get a decent amount of units you have to pay much money to big mining clusters most of them controlled by founders of the coin that have the most of the emission totally in their hands. How is supposed to be more fair this?