Yes, I believe you have hit the nail on the head here. The reason many people have a hard time with all of this is because they have believed for many years that Bitcoin is solving a problem in the world by becoming a medium of exchange. We are talking years of writing, posts, belief, momentum, etc.
It is very hard for people with this amount of investment in the idea of Bitcoin as a future medium of exchange, including myself, to even temporarily consider the possibility that it may be more expedient to not expand the utility of Bitcoin as a medium of exchange.
Personally, what I have done is to temporarily suspend my belief that is must become a widely accepted medium of exchange long enough to see what you are talking about.
What we have been talking about here, long before you showed up is: Bitcoin -> wider acceptance -> higher TPS -> price stability -> take on the banks -> etc.
The ideas you have presented in this thread are revolutionary given the collective closely held belief systems of the entire Bitcoin community.
So then what do we do. They say you only need 10 people firm in their belief:
https://news.rpi.edu/luwakkey/2902But thats silly, I think what it could mean tho, is 10 people who KNOW they are grounded in solid logic and reason, and then a tipping point can be viral. There are many people that would understand me, and what I present I think, but i can't reach them, and I can't hold their attention long enough for them to realize that its not just something that insignificant.
And yes you say you temporarily suspended your beliefs, and this is LITERALLY what the protocol bohmian dialogue is for. The community on both sides has this tacit assumption, we should want to bring awareness to it.
cheers.