Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB)
by
Carlton Banks
on 11/03/2017, 18:41:42 UTC
There is no "reserved for future use". Franky is a misleading statement incarnate.

The Segwit testnet mined a 4MB block, just by including alot of multi-signature transactions (which obviously have a much heavier transaction:signature ratio than regular transactions)

So is this the extreme case where a large number of inputs is used in a transaction to fill up the segwit space?

The opposite

Multi signature means a single input signed by more than one key.



How can you pretend not to understnad something so simple.....