Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB)
by
AngryDwarf
on 11/03/2017, 19:11:27 UTC
The Segwit testnet mined a 4MB block, just by including alot of multi-signature transactions (which obviously have a much heavier transaction:signature ratio than regular transactions)

So how many multiple signatures was associated with the address of this transaction, and many signatures did it require?

Would the seperation of witness data to transaction data make the space used any less?

How important is this to the implementation of lightning networks?