and liberalism rob people of their home, if they can't pay the bills...
they shouldn't have signed the mortgage.
then they would still be without homes.
Not at all. They could rent, live with friends, or parents, or get together with some other people and share a house.
so they could not live in an empty house, because someone could potentially earn money from it, if someone was willing to buy?
i do not agree that there should be homeless people, when there are empty homes.