So i just posted here that PIvx appears to be a new version of dash without the bad start
I posted a response to a newbie-created thread asking about OWL and BOScoin.
(But that's probably normal for bitcointalk)
Cheers
Graham
Edit. I thought to check my drafts:
Quote
looked into the most public implementation project at the moment, BOScoin.
As written, the BOScoin white paper is nonsensical conjecture. The authors are hallucinating a requirement for a procedural extension to a declarative representation.
Wrt OWL and ontologies - fwiw, the blockchain is a directed acyclic graph (DAG) and in consequence, it maps straight into an RDF model. Unlike BOScoin, I can offer a proof-of-concept, see the DOACC ontology, developed from Melvin Carvalho's initial CCY ontology:
DOACC docs: https://doacc.github.io/
DOACC repos: https://github.com/DOACC
DOACC ontology https://github.com/DOACC/doacc/blob/master/doacc.owl
DOACC population: https://github.com/DOACC/individuals
If you're interested in exploring OWL and the subset DLs and you're not already aware of Stanford's FOSS ontology authoring app, Protege, then obtaining a copy and working through the basic ?how to create an ontology? tutorials will give you a +5 spell of immunity from BOScoin-style bloviation.
Cheers
Graham
Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1825607.0
The above (posted) response has disappeared completely - no deletion advice, nothing. The only trace is in my drafts.
Probably a database hiccup and, I suspect, perfectly normal for bitcointalk.
Cheers
Graham
I guess we will never know
although I did notice a new mod in here last night which I have not seen before.