⭐ Merited by nullius (1)
however core 0.13.1+ and knots.. bypassed consensus by going soft
willing to split the minority off once reaching 95% (bip9 allows this)
Nope. Soft forks have always been used and you start complaining about them now. I wonder why. willing to split the minority off once reaching 95% (bip9 allows this)
after all (which you know because i quoted it to you many times) gmaxwell actually invited the non core implementations to split off ages ago and they all laughed in his face.
Wrong. He was talking about consensus altering implementations.BU needs more attacks - go for.
BU get's more fixes and has the luxury to run in a real live testnet side by side to core - finally nothing really happend, but BU got stronger
There are apparently other exploits that have been properly disclosed, but the BU team failed to fix so far. This team's incompetence is on a prestiege level.BU get's more fixes and has the luxury to run in a real live testnet side by side to core - finally nothing really happend, but BU got stronger
how does SW and the hidden bugs in it?
Bullshit as always from BTU fanatics. Go find those bugs:1) Testnet.
2) Live network on Groestlcoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=525926.msg17607303#msg17607303
3) Live network 2 (soon) Viacoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=699278.6080
3) BU devs are being childs about their own fuckup:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5zhmwn/andrew_stones_bu_dev_fake_screenshot_is_a_poor/
This is one of the most fucked up public stunt screw ups yet.https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5zhmwn/andrew_stones_bu_dev_fake_screenshot_is_a_poor/