BU nodes go offline. but the diversity of other nodes kept going..
however if everything was just core.. expect another 2013 event.
diversity and more then one codebase is GOOD for the network
relying on one team that has one king is no better than fiat. and that is bad.
BU, xt, classic, and many others (including some core tweaked version, will all run happily together.
but blockstream(core) only want blockstream approved code running which if one goes down. they all go down.
oh and if there was a bug in dynamics requiring a downgrade. blocks just have to drop to below 1mb again and everything is back to as it is now.
if there was a bug in sgwit requiring a downgrade. anyone with funds on segwit keys cant spend them.. locked
however if everything was just core.. expect another 2013 event.
diversity and more then one codebase is GOOD for the network
relying on one team that has one king is no better than fiat. and that is bad.
BU, xt, classic, and many others (including some core tweaked version, will all run happily together.
but blockstream(core) only want blockstream approved code running which if one goes down. they all go down.
oh and if there was a bug in dynamics requiring a downgrade. blocks just have to drop to below 1mb again and everything is back to as it is now.
if there was a bug in sgwit requiring a downgrade. anyone with funds on segwit keys cant spend them.. locked
Thats a lie, that rebound from BU nodes comming online again happend in a very short time, thats not diversity
those nodes are in control by a few people! Claiming Core nodes comming down when 1 goes bust is another major lie. Core nodes are more wide-spread over the globe. You are frustrated because you know that BU is in deep shit.