I already tried to play with martingale but to be honest i don't gain profit instead i lose them all i tried to follow and also analyze the game after making the 6 straight lose trying to cool on betting to see your friend that you didn't give up on betting after loosing my bankroll i never tried playing with martingale im much more better to follow what i want in betting.
If you are having a bigger balance then you should win if you are playing according to your bank roll. I used to play martingale with a good balance and i am never in a loss because all my calculations are up to the point so that i do not bust even if hit 17 reds in 2x and if i hit the 17 red points i will still recover but my profit will take a hit.
Yes is what I'm thinking as well. You need to have a bigger balance to order to maximize this system. Because if you have only a small bankroll, you will surely lost everything. I tried to used this as well, but since I only have a small bankroll, it never materialized in my end. So I came into conclusion that to lessen the risk of losing everything in the long run, having a huge bankroll will help even you if have a losing streak and recover it one you take a hit after a successive lost.
Yes, your huge bankroll will play an important role in deciding your success while you are using Martingale strategy but the catch here must need, like many gamblers claim you might need bigger bankroll than the gambling house.
This is just a theoretical approach because we cannot be sure how long the losing streak will persist. Some gamblers are coming up and claiming that they were facing continuous 30+ losing streaks. So, we cannot be sure to withstand a continuous losing streak with a martingale strategy. It means only infinite bankroll could save us.
In short, beating gambling house through martingale strategy seems impossible as the ball is in their court. We could not do anything about it.