dymanics has the hard consensus of nodes and pools. which means NODES can vote against pools.
Here you go again. If pools want A, and they have a serious $$$ stake in A, and the currently active nodes want B, what stops pools to fire up 3 times more nodes voting A for a tiny fraction of $$$ ?
Did you still not understand that proof of work was invented to avoid vote by node, because the above Sybil attack is far too easy ?
And don't confuse users (people exchanging coins for value in the market) with nodes again...