All IPs listed above were submitting or relaying invalid blocks, which is very bad thing so banscore went from 0 -> 100 immidiately. Listed IPs are of
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.
I am in this list. I compiled the client from git master's head less than 24h ago. What nonsense is this? The chain is forked by the devs at a whim?
Just did a git pull, saw one commit, git diff HEAD^ shows ugly hacks testing a minimum block that was already reached.
The commit was published less than 24h before it was needed to remain on the main chain, that's quite brutal. I wonder if all exchanges are on the right chain and how they will react if they aren't...
These are my statistics from P2Pool.
Why are there 104.xxx and 100.xxx blocks? Or isn't that the blockchain?
